Productivity · Project ManagementsituationalTask ManagementCalendarIntegrationSAAS

Asana Lacks Native Time Tracking, Week Numbers, and Open Gmail Integration

Project managers using Asana must rely on third-party tools for time tracking and lack standard calendar features like week numbers. The Gmail plugin is closed-source, preventing customization for specific workflows. These gaps force teams to maintain multiple tools where a unified platform would suffice.

1mentions
1sources
4.8

Signal

Visibility

5

Leverage

Impact

Sign in free to unlock the full scoring breakdown, root-cause analysis, and solution blueprint.

Sign up free

Already have an account? Sign in

Deep Analysis

Root causes, cross-domain patterns, and opportunity mapping

Sign up free to read the full analysis — no credit card required.

Already have an account? Sign in

Solution Blueprint

Tech stack, MVP scope, go-to-market strategy, and competitive landscape

Sign up free to read the full analysis — no credit card required.

Already have an account? Sign in

Similar Problems

surfaced semantically
Productivity87% match

Asana Issue: glitchy garbage, reverts to year old calender, tas

Individual user complaint about Asana project management tool. Low engagement review.

Productivity85% match

Asana Missing Task Duration Fields and Timeline Undo

Asana lacks the ability to set task duration directly and has no undo function for accidental timeline moves. These are standard project planning features present in competing PM tools. Teams managing time-sensitive projects are left without recovery options after misclicks in the timeline view.

Productivity85% match

Asana Lacks Individual Task-Level Time Tracking for Personal Productivity Monitoring

Asana only provides project-level time tracking, leaving users who need per-task time data for billing or productivity analysis reliant on third-party integrations. This gap is particularly costly for freelancers and agencies who charge by the hour.

Productivity85% match

Asana Missing Integrations and Poor Quality of Existing Ones

Asana users find certain needed third-party integrations absent entirely, while existing integrations feel ill-fitted or poorly implemented for their intended workflows. This limits Asana's utility as a central hub for teams with complex toolchains. The gap is structural and affects teams choosing or evaluating PM platforms.

Productivity84% match

Asana Sorting and Filtering Options Too Limited for Power Users

Asana's sorting capabilities fall short of what power users need to efficiently locate and prioritize tasks across large projects. The limited options force users to manually scan lists rather than filtering to relevant items. This friction scales poorly as project complexity grows.

Problem descriptions, scores, analysis, and solution blueprints may be updated as new community data becomes available.